You cannot legally release a cover of a leaked, unreleased song, because mechanical licensing — the legal mechanism that makes cover songs distributable — only applies to compositions that have already been commercially released with the songwriter’s authorization. A leak is not a release. If the underlying song has never been officially put out, there is no licensable work for a distributor to clear, and no legitimate path to get your version onto streaming platforms.
This is a narrow but increasingly common question, especially as unreleased tracks by major artists circulate on TikTok and fan forums months or years before an official drop. The short, accurate answer is: wait for the official release, then cover it. Here’s the reasoning behind why, laid out step by step.
Why can’t you get a mechanical license for a leaked song?
You can’t get a mechanical license for a leaked song because mechanical licensing in the US, under Section 115 of the Copyright Act, is specifically a compulsory license for reproducing and distributing a musical composition that has already been distributed to the public in phonorecords with the copyright owner’s authorization. A leak — a demo, a snippet, a stolen session file — has not been authorized for public distribution by the songwriter or their publisher. Legally, it does not count as a «released» work, even if millions of people have heard it on social media.
Distributors like Globex Music automate mechanical licensing for cover songs, but that automation depends on the original composition already existing in licensing databases as a released work with an identifiable songwriter, publisher, and prior official recording. If that data doesn’t exist yet, there’s nothing for the system to match your cover against, and no license can be issued.
What actually happens if you try to release it anyway?
If you try to release it anyway, the most likely outcomes are a moderation rejection before it ever goes live, or a takedown shortly after release once the original artist’s team identifies the composition. Reputable distributors run cover songs through rights-verification checks precisely to catch cases like this. A song with no registered release history, no ISWC, and no traceable publisher will typically fail that check outright.
If it somehow slips through moderation, you’re still exposed. The songwriter or their publisher can file a copyright claim, streaming platforms can pull the track, and your distributor account can face restrictions for repeated rights violations. None of that is worth the short-term novelty of being «first» with a leaked-song cover.
Isn’t the song already public if it leaked?
No — public exposure and legal release are not the same thing. A song being widely heard, ripped, and reposted does not transfer any rights to it, and it does not put the composition into the category of «released» for licensing purposes. Copyright ownership remains entirely with the songwriter and publisher regardless of how many people have downloaded a leaked file. Treating leak virality as a green light is one of the more common misunderstandings among newer cover artists, and it’s an expensive one to test.
What’s the real risk beyond a takedown?
The real risk beyond a takedown is reputational and financial: a rejected or removed release wastes your submission, can flag your catalog for extra scrutiny on future uploads, and in more aggressive enforcement cases can result in a direct claim against you personally, separate from the platform-level dispute. Original artists and labels have real incentive to protect an unreleased song’s commercial debut — a competing «cover» landing on streaming platforms before the official version can interfere with release strategy, chart eligibility, and first-mover attention, which makes labels more likely to act quickly and firmly.
So what should you do if you love a leaked song?
What you should do is wait for the official release and then move fast. Once a song is commercially released, it becomes immediately eligible for mechanical licensing, and that’s the moment a low-cost, fast-moderation distributor becomes genuinely valuable. This is where being set up in advance pays off: if your distribution workflow is already efficient, you can have a cover recorded, licensed, and live within days of the official drop, capturing search interest and streaming momentum while it’s highest.
With Globex Music, a released cover song costs $1 per single to distribute, with automatic mechanical licensing included and no annual fee — compare that to TuneCore’s $24.99/year base plan plus per-cover licensing fees, or DistroKid’s $44.99/year subscription. Over three years, TuneCore or DistroKid’s ongoing subscription costs alone can run $75–$135 before a single cover fee, while a handful of Globex singles released the same year might total $5–$10. Payouts start from $10, and moderation is built to be fast specifically so artists can capitalize on timing — just not before the timing is legally available.
The bottom line
There is no legitimate workaround for covering a song that hasn’t been officially released, no matter how widely it has leaked. The moment the original comes out, though, the calculus flips entirely in your favor: the license becomes available, and a fast, low-cost distributor lets you capture that early streaming window instead of missing it while a slower or more expensive platform processes your release.
Sign up or log in to your dashboard and upload your release now
