Releasing a cover song without a mechanical license typically results in one of three outcomes: the platform rejects it during moderation before it ever goes live, it gets taken down after release once a rights holder flags it, or it stays up but any royalties it earns get held or clawed back. None of these outcomes are hypothetical — they are the routine, well-documented consequence of skipping a step that exists specifically because cover songs use someone else’s copyrighted composition.
Understanding exactly what breaks, and when, is more useful than a vague warning to ‘get licensed first.’ Here is the mechanics of what actually happens at each stage.
What is a mechanical license, and why does a cover song need one?
A mechanical license is the legal permission required to reproduce and distribute someone else’s musical composition — the melody and lyrics, not the original recording. When you record your own version of a song, you’re creating a new recording, but the underlying composition still belongs to the original songwriter and their publisher. In the United States, this is codified through compulsory mechanical licensing under Section 115 of the Copyright Act, which means the license must exist, but it doesn’t get created automatically just because you hit upload. Someone — you or your distributor — has to actually secure it.
This is different from getting caught for plagiarism or theft. You’re not stealing the song; you’re using a legally available licensing mechanism incorrectly, or not using it at all. That distinction matters because it explains why enforcement looks like automated takedowns and royalty holds rather than lawsuits in the vast majority of cases.
What happens during moderation if a cover has no license?
Most reputable distributors now check for licensing status before a cover song is submitted to any of the 200+ platforms, and a release lacking documentation gets stopped right there. This is the cheapest possible failure point — the release simply doesn’t go live, no takedown notice, no royalty complications, just a rejection and a request to resubmit with licensing in place. Distributors that build automatic mechanical licensing into the submission flow, as Globex Music does for cover releases, remove this failure point entirely because the license gets generated as part of uploading the track rather than as a separate step someone forgets.
What happens if an unlicensed cover already went live?
If a cover slips through without a license and reaches Spotify, Apple Music, YouTube Music, or any other platform, the most common outcome is a takedown triggered by the platform’s own content identification systems or a direct claim from the publisher. Content ID-style matching on platforms like YouTube can flag a cover within hours of upload because it’s comparing the melody and lyric structure, not just the audio fingerprint of the original recording. Streaming platforms don’t need to prove intent to remove a track — a licensing gap is sufficient justification on its own.
Takedowns rarely happen instantly on audio-only DSPs the way they do on YouTube, which is part of why unlicensed covers can sit live for weeks or months before anyone notices. That delay is not safety — it’s a longer runway for the eventual removal to also wipe out any accumulated stream history and momentum on that track’s page.
What happens to royalties earned before a takedown?
Royalties generated by an unlicensed cover are legally owed to the composition’s rights holder, not the artist who recorded the cover — this is true regardless of whether a distributor has already paid them out. In practice, this means a distributor can withhold pending payouts tied to the flagged release, and in some cases claw back amounts already advanced. This is one of the more damaging outcomes because it doesn’t just cost you the future earnings of that one track — it can affect your account’s payout eligibility more broadly while the dispute is resolved.
Can you get banned from a distributor for this?
Repeated unlicensed releases can lead to account suspension, not just individual track removal. Distributors that operate at scale across 200+ platforms are contractually accountable to those platforms for the content they submit, so a pattern of licensing violations from one account creates liability the distributor has to act on. A single accidental unlicensed submission that gets caught and corrected is a minor, common event. A pattern of them is a business risk to the account itself.
Does this only apply to well-known songs?
No — licensing obligations apply regardless of how popular or obscure the original song is. A cover of a deep album cut from a mid-sized catalog carries the same licensing requirement as a cover of a chart-topping single. The likelihood of getting caught may scale with popularity, since bigger publishers run more active monitoring, but the legal exposure does not depend on fame. Treating obscure-song covers as ‘safe’ to skip licensing on is a common and costly misread of how the system actually works.
How much does proper licensing actually cost, compared to the risk?
This is where the math strongly favors doing it right the first time. Globex Music includes automatic mechanical licensing at $1 per release, with no annual fee and payouts starting from $10. Compare that to the cost of a takedown: lost momentum on the release, withheld royalties, moderation delays on your next submission while your account is reviewed, and in repeat cases, loss of distribution access altogether. A $1 licensing cost is negligible against even a single blocked payout cycle.
Other distributors handle this differently in ways that add friction or cost. TuneCore charges per-cover licensing fees on top of its $24.99/year base plan, and adds a 20% commission specifically on social platform revenue. CD Baby charges $9.95 per single and takes a 9% royalty commission indefinitely on top of that. DistroKid’s $44.99/year plan doesn’t include licensing as a built-in, per-release feature the way a $1 cover-specific release does. When licensing is bundled directly into a low, flat per-release price with no recurring fee, there’s no financial incentive to skip the step or treat it as optional.
What should you do if you’ve already released a cover without a license?
Address it before a platform or publisher does — contact your distributor, get the mechanical license secured retroactively where possible, and be prepared for the release to be taken down and resubmitted properly. Acting first, rather than waiting for a takedown notice, generally results in a faster resolution and less disruption to your account’s standing. Fast moderation works in your favor here too: a corrected resubmission with proper licensing can go through review quickly rather than sitting in a long queue.
The underlying lesson is straightforward and worth stating plainly: mechanical licensing for a cover song is not a formality that can be skipped when convenient — it’s the mechanism that makes a cover legally releasable at all, and modern distribution pricing has made compliance cheap enough that skipping it is a false economy in every case.
Sign up or log in to your dashboard and upload your release now
