Yes, you can legally release a cover of a cover song. The mechanical license you need traces back to the original songwriter and publisher of the underlying composition, not to whichever artist’s recorded version inspired you — so it does not matter whether you learned the song from the 1967 original or a 2019 cover that went viral on TikTok.

This distinction trips up a surprising number of independent artists, and it is worth understanding clearly before you record, because getting it wrong does not just risk a takedown — it can mean crediting and paying the wrong party entirely.

What actually gets licensed when you cover a cover?

A mechanical license covers the musical composition — the lyrics and melody as written — not any specific sound recording of it. When a cover artist records their own version of a song, they create a new sound recording (a «master»), but the underlying composition still belongs to the original songwriter and their publisher. If you then cover that cover artist’s version, you are still, legally speaking, recording the original composition. Your license request and royalty reporting need to point to the original writer, identified through the composition’s ISWC or through a rights database search, not to the intermediate cover artist.

This is true no matter how many layers deep the chain goes. A cover of a cover of a cover is still, at its legal core, a new recording of one original composition. The number of intermediate versions is irrelevant to the licensing requirement.

Do you need permission from the artist who covered it first?

No. You do not need permission from an intermediate cover artist, and you do not owe them royalties, because they generally do not own the composition — they only own their specific recording of it. Under U.S. copyright law, once a song has been commercially released, it becomes eligible for a compulsory mechanical license, meaning any artist can record and distribute their own version without asking the songwriter’s permission first, as long as the required royalty is paid through proper channels. That right runs to the composition itself, and it passes through every subsequent cover in the chain back to the original writer.

The one exception worth flagging: if the cover you heard introduced a genuinely new, separately copyrightable arrangement — a distinct new melodic bridge, additional original lyrics, a substantially reworked structure that goes beyond a standard arrangement — elements of that specific arrangement could carry their own rights. This is uncommon for typical acoustic, remix, or genre-swap covers, but it does occasionally apply to covers that heavily reinterpret a song (think a cover that adds a full original rap verse or new chorus).

How do you find the original songwriter if you only know the cover version?

Search the composition title alongside «songwriter» or «written by» in a performing rights organization database such as ASCAP’s ACE or BMI’s Repertoire search, or check the composition credits listed on the original recording in any major streaming catalog. Most cover versions retain the same title as the original, which makes this straightforward in the majority of cases. Where it gets harder is with cover versions that renamed the song, translated the lyrics, or are commonly mistaken for the original because the cover became more popular — Jeff Buckley’s version of «Hallelujah» is a well-known example where many listeners assume Buckley wrote it, when the composition credit belongs to Leonard Cohen.

Getting this credit right matters beyond compliance. Metadata errors at the composition level are one of the most common reasons cover releases get flagged or delayed during distributor review, since the system cross-checks your declared songwriter against known rights holder databases.

What changes if the cover you’re covering added new lyrics or a new arrangement?

If the version you are working from includes substantial new lyrical content — a translated verse, an added rap section, a parody rewrite — you are now dealing with a derivative work that may itself require separate clearance from whoever created those additions, on top of the standard mechanical license for the original composition. This is different from a standard cover, where you are free to change the arrangement, instrumentation, tempo, or genre without needing extra permission, since a compulsory license explicitly allows reasonable arrangement changes.

The safest approach when you are unsure how much a cover version deviated from the source material is to go back to the original lyrics and melody and record your own arrangement from there, rather than replicating someone else’s reinterpretation note for note. This sidesteps the question of derivative arrangement rights entirely and keeps your licensing situation clean and standard.

How does this affect distribution and moderation?

Distributors that handle cover licensing internally still need the correct original songwriter listed to issue a valid mechanical license, so accurate composition credit is the single biggest factor in how smoothly a cover-of-a-cover release moves through review. On Globex Music, covers go through moderation with automatic mechanical licensing built into the release process, and correctly credited covers typically clear review in a timeframe measured in hours to a couple of days rather than the multi-week manual clearance processes some licensing-heavy platforms require. Submitting the composition’s original writer rather than the intermediate cover artist is the detail that keeps that timeline fast.

What does this cost compared to other distributors?

Globex Music distributes cover songs, including covers of covers, for $1 per release with no annual fee, and royalty payouts start from $10 USD. That compares to DistroKid’s $44.99 annual plan, TuneCore’s $24.99 base annual fee plus per-cover licensing charges and a 20% commission specifically on social platform revenue, and CD Baby’s $9.95 per single plus a 9% royalty commission that applies permanently to that release. Over three years of releasing a handful of covers a year, the cumulative gap between a flat $1 per release and a recurring annual subscription or per-track royalty cut becomes substantial — and it compounds with every additional cover you put out.

The bottom line

A cover of a cover is legally no different from a cover of an original: the compulsory mechanical license runs to the songwriter of the underlying composition, regardless of how many recorded versions sit between you and them. Identify the original writer, license against that composition, keep your arrangement changes within the bounds of a standard cover, and the rest of the process — moderation, distribution, and royalty payout — works the same as any other cover release.

Sign up or log in to your dashboard and upload your release now

Latest from the blog

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!