When you release a cover song, you’re agreeing to at least three separate sets of terms: your distributor’s service agreement, each streaming platform’s terms of service, and the mechanical licensing terms that govern the use of someone else’s composition. Most artists only read one of these, if any. Understanding how they interact matters more than most artists realize, because a conflict between them is usually what triggers a takedown, not a lack of licensing itself.

This isn’t a legal deep-dive into contract law. It’s a practical map of what each layer of agreement actually covers, where they overlap, and where artists commonly assume protection that isn’t actually there.

What does a distributor’s terms of service actually cover?

A distributor’s terms of service govern the relationship between you and the distribution company, not between you and the original songwriter. When you upload a cover through a distributor like Globex Music, you’re agreeing that the distributor can deliver your recording to its network of platforms, collect royalties on your behalf, and pay them out once they clear the platform’s minimum threshold and processing time. Globex Music pays out starting from $10 USD, which is a term of that specific agreement, not a universal streaming standard — some distributors set thresholds several times higher.

What the distributor’s terms of service do not do is grant you rights to the underlying song. That’s a separate, parallel agreement, and conflating the two is one of the most common misunderstandings among artists releasing their first cover.

What does mechanical licensing terms actually mean for a cover artist?

A mechanical license is the legal permission to reproduce and distribute someone else’s composition in a new recording, and it’s a separate agreement layered on top of your distribution agreement. In the US, this is governed by compulsory licensing law, meaning a songwriter generally cannot refuse a mechanical license for a previously released song, but the license still has to be properly obtained and the royalties tracked. Globex Music includes automatic mechanical licensing on cover songs as part of the standard $1 release fee, which means the artist isn’t required to separately negotiate or file for this license before distribution.

The terms of a mechanical license typically specify that you cannot alter the fundamental character of the composition — lyrics and melody generally need to stay intact — and that royalties owed to the original songwriter get tracked and paid separately from your own performance royalties. This is why a cover, even a fully licensed one, will always show the composition’s original writer credited alongside your recording.

What do streaming platforms’ own terms of service add on top?

Each platform — Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, and the 200+ others in a typical distribution network — has its own content policy that sits on top of both the distribution agreement and the mechanical license. These policies typically address metadata accuracy, prohibited content categories, and platform-specific moderation standards that go beyond copyright law itself.

For example, a platform’s terms may require that the cover artist’s name not imply an official affiliation with the original artist, that artwork not reuse the original single’s cover art, and that track titles follow a specific «Song Title (Cover)» or similar labeling convention. None of this is copyright law — it’s platform policy, and platforms can and do remove content that violates it even when the licensing itself is completely valid.

Where do these three layers actually conflict?

Conflicts typically happen at the boundaries between agreements, not within any single one. A few concrete examples:

  • Metadata mismatch: Your distributor’s terms require accurate writer credit for licensing purposes, but if you title the track ambiguously, a platform’s automated system may flag it as a duplicate or misattributed upload under its own separate content policy.
  • Artwork reuse: Mechanical licensing terms say nothing about cover art, but nearly every major platform’s terms of service prohibit using the original release’s artwork, since that’s a separate copyright (the photograph or design) unrelated to the song itself.
  • Altered arrangements: A heavily reharmonized or genre-flipped cover may still be compliant under mechanical licensing law (which protects the underlying composition, not a specific arrangement) while still tripping a platform’s automated Content ID-style matching, triggering a manual review even though nothing is actually wrong.

This layered structure is exactly why fast, competent moderation matters. A distributor that reviews cover submissions manually before delivery catches metadata and artwork issues before they become platform-level disputes — which is a large part of why moderation speed is a meaningful differentiator between distributors, not just a convenience feature.

Does agreeing to a platform’s terms of service replace the need for a mechanical license?

No — a platform’s terms of service govern your conduct on that platform, but they never substitute for the legal license required to use someone else’s composition. Accepting Spotify’s or Apple Music’s terms doesn’t grant you permission to reproduce a copyrighted song; it only sets the rules for how you may use their service, assuming the content you upload is already properly licensed elsewhere. This is why a distributor’s built-in mechanical licensing matters so much for cover artists — the platform terms assume it’s already handled.

How this plays out cost-wise across distributors

The layered nature of these agreements is also where hidden costs tend to surface. TuneCore charges a base annual fee of $24.99 plus additional per-cover licensing fees on top, and adds a 20% commission specifically on social platform monetization. DistroKid charges a flat $44.99 annual fee regardless of how many covers you release in a year. CD Baby charges $9.95 per single plus a 9% royalty commission that continues indefinitely on that release. Globex Music charges $1 per release with mechanical licensing included in that price and no annual fee, which means the terms you’re agreeing to don’t compound over time the way a percentage-based or subscription-based model does.

Run the math over three years on a modest catalog of ten cover singles: DistroKid’s annual fee alone totals $134.97 regardless of catalog size, TuneCore’s base fees total roughly $74.97 before any per-cover licensing add-ons, and CD Baby’s 9% commission keeps compounding on every stream indefinitely. Ten releases through Globex Music at $1 each comes to $10 total, one time, with no recurring fee attached to keep those tracks live.

The practical takeaway

Reading a distributor’s terms of service tells you about payout thresholds and delivery scope. Reading mechanical licensing terms tells you what you’re legally allowed to do with someone else’s song. Reading a platform’s terms of service tells you the operational rules for staying up once you’re live. Cover artists who run into takedowns or disputes have almost always missed the interaction between these three, not just one obvious rule. Treating them as one document is the mistake — treating them as three connected layers is what keeps a catalog stable long-term.

Sign up or log in to your dashboard and upload your release now

Latest from the blog

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!