Scroll through any streaming platform and you’ll find dozens of versions of well-known songs — but every so often an artist wants to cover something obscure, a deep cut, or a track that genuinely has zero cover versions anywhere. It feels like uncharted territory. Is it actually riskier from a legal or business standpoint, or does it just feel that way because there’s no precedent to look at?
Let’s break down what actually changes — and what doesn’t — when you’re the first person to ever record a cover of a particular song.
The Legal Rules Don’t Care Whether You’re First
This is the most important thing to understand: mechanical licensing law doesn’t distinguish between the 500th cover of a song and the very first one. In the US, once a song has been commercially released with the copyright owner’s permission, anyone can record and distribute their own version under a compulsory mechanical license — no direct permission from the original writer needed, as long as royalties are paid through proper licensing and the lyrics/melody aren’t altered beyond what’s allowed.
That rule applies identically whether you’re covering a song with 200 existing versions or a song nobody has ever touched. There’s no extra approval step, no additional gatekeeper, and no legal requirement to prove that other covers exist before you release your own.
Where the Real Risk Actually Comes From
The perceived risk with an uncovered song usually isn’t legal — it’s informational. Established songs have a paper trail: known publishers, clear writer splits, and licensing data already sitting in databases used by distributors and PROs. An obscure or rarely-covered song may lack that trail, which creates a few practical challenges instead of legal ones:
- Harder rights research. You may need to dig to confirm who currently holds the publishing rights, especially for older, regional, or independently released originals.
- Less certainty on metadata. Original writer names and publisher information might not be neatly documented, which can slow down moderation if a distributor needs to verify details.
- No commercial track record. With zero prior covers, there’s no data point showing whether an audience responds to alternate versions of that particular song — you’re testing that assumption yourself.
None of these are dealbreakers. They just mean you should expect to spend a bit more time confirming details before submission rather than assuming the licensing itself is more complicated.
A Practical Comparison: Familiar Hit vs. Obscure Original
| Well-known, often-covered song | Never-before-covered song | |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing requirement | Mechanical license via distributor | Same — mechanical license via distributor |
| Rights research needed | Minimal — writer/publisher data readily available | More — may require manual lookup of original release info |
| Moderation speed | Fast, since metadata matches known records | Slightly longer if publisher details need confirming |
| Audience demand data | Existing covers show listener appetite | Unknown — you’re the first data point |
The takeaway: the licensing mechanics are identical. The only added friction is research time on your end before you submit.
How to De-Risk It Before You Hit Submit
If you’re set on covering a song that’s genuinely never been covered, a little upfront diligence goes a long way:
- Confirm the original was commercially released with proper authorization — this is what makes it eligible for a compulsory mechanical license in the first place.
- Track down the writer and publisher information using PRO databases (ASCAP, BMI, SESAC in the US) or the liner notes/credits from the original release.
- Keep your arrangement close to the original — melody and lyrics intact — since compulsory licenses generally don’t cover substantial reinterpretations of the underlying composition.
- Have accurate metadata ready before submission: original title, original writer(s), and release info, so moderation isn’t held up by missing details.
Why the Cost of Testing This Stays Low
Because there’s no way to know in advance whether an obscure cover will resonate with listeners, it makes sense to keep the financial risk as low as the legal risk. At $1 per release with automatic mechanical licensing included, Globex Music removes the two biggest cost variables from the equation entirely — you’re not paying a premium for licensing research, and you’re not locked into an annual plan if the track underperforms.
Compare that to what testing an unproven cover costs elsewhere:
- DistroKid: $44.99/year regardless of how many of your covers actually find an audience.
- TuneCore: $24.99/year base cost, plus separate per-cover licensing fees, plus a 20% commission specifically on social platform monetization.
- CD Baby: $9.95 per single up front, and a 9% royalty commission that applies forever on that release.
With Globex, releasing five experimental covers of little-known songs costs around $5 total — versus committing to a $44.99 or $24.99 annual fee before you even know if the idea works. Royalties start being payable from as little as $10, and there’s no annual fee tying you down if you decide to try a different song next month instead.
Fast Moderation Matters More Here, Not Less
Since obscure-song covers can involve a bit more metadata verification, fast turnaround on moderation matters even more — you don’t want a slow review process compounding the extra research time. Globex Music’s review process is built for speed precisely so cover artists testing new or unusual material aren’t stuck waiting weeks to find out if their submission was accepted.
The Bottom Line
Covering a song nobody has covered before isn’t legally riskier — the same mechanical licensing rules apply regardless of how many versions exist. What changes is the amount of due diligence you need to do to confirm ownership and get your metadata right. Once that’s handled, distributing it is exactly as straightforward as releasing a cover of a chart-topping classic, and at $1 per release, there’s very little reason not to take the shot on that song only you seem to have noticed.
Sign up or log in to your dashboard and upload your release now
Latest from the blog
- Staying Eligible for Playlist Placement With a Cover Song Release
- Releasing a Cover When You Don’t Know Who Owns the Publishing
- Keeping the Rights to Your Own Recording of a Cover Song
- Splitting Royalties Fairly With a Producer on a Cover Release
- Covering a Song With Multiple Credited Writers: Who Gets Paid
